1. Restructuring YouTube Video Summaries
Core Mission
Transform any video into a comprehensive, in-depth article that provides readers with a richer, more profound understanding than simply watching the original footage.
Core Requirements
- Integrity First: Ensure readers grasp all essential content without needing to re-watch the video.
- Depth First: Expand on every key point, providing sufficient detail and context.
- Experience First: Convey the author’s thought process and emotional resonance.
- Beyond the Original: Leverage the power of text to provide clearer logic and deeper insights than the video alone.
Output Structure
Video Metadata
- Title, Author, URL, Duration
Introduction
Write a compelling opening that highlights the video’s unique value and why it is worth a deep dive.
Content Breakdown
Segment the content naturally based on internal logic. For each section:
[Section Title] [Start Time-End Time]
Core Concept
[Distill the key takeaway of this section in 1-2 sentences.]
Deep Analysis
- Reconstruct the author’s full reasoning and logic.
- Explain the background, causes, implications, and significance in detail.
- Preserve the author’s unique voice and tone.
- Key Quote: “[Original Quote]-[English Translation]”
[MM:SS] - Include all data and case studies.
- Visual Descriptions: Describe charts, presentations, PPTs, or on-screen elements in detail.
- Simplify complex concepts using analogies.
- Provide actionable guides or precautions for any methodologies mentioned.
Personal Reflections
[Capture any personal experiences or emotional insights shared by the author.]
Extended Thoughts
[Discuss deeper implications or connections to other fields.]
Key Takeaways
Summarize the most valuable insights, actionable advice, and perspective-shifting moments.
Writing Guidelines
Informational
- No Compression: Expand on every important point (aim for 600-800+ words per section).
- Authenticity: Stay strictly to the video content; note any areas of uncertainty.
- Completeness: Capture the author’s full thought process and personal stories.
Expression
- Engaging: Write a compelling narrative, not a dry transcript.
- Personality: Retain the author’s unique style and flair.
- Enhanced Clarity: Use written language to make complex topics more digestible.
- Resonance: Convey genuine emotions like enthusiasm, confusion, or excitement.
Experience
- Immersive: Make the reader feel like they are engaging in a conversation with the author.
- Inspiration: Go beyond information transfer—spark critical thinking.
- Utility: Offer practical insights that can be applied immediately.
- Superiority: Ensure the final output adds value beyond the original video.
Timestamp System
- Section range:
[MM:SS-MM:SS] - Important quote:
[MM:SS]
2. Academic Paper Version
The complete prompt is as follows:
Core Mission
Provide a professional, rigorous, and deep analysis of an academic paper, enabling researchers to grasp the research problem, methodology, key findings, and academic contributions without reading the full text, while quickly assessing its value in the field.
Core Requirements
- Academic Rigor: Ensure accurate interpretation of research design, data, and logic in accordance with academic standards.
- Theoretical Depth: Clearly reveal theoretical foundations, core hypotheses, and how the work impacts existing theoretical systems.
- Complete Reproduction: Cover everything from the research question to the conclusion, with zero loss of critical methodology or data.
- Beyond Translation: Produce an efficient “Academic Speed-Reading Report” that exposes internal logic and innovation better than a literal translation.
Output Structure
Paper Information
- Title: [Original Title]
- Authors: [List of Authors]
- Journal/Conference: [Name]
- Year: [YYYY]
- DOI: [Link]
- URL: [Link]
Structured Abstract
- Background/Objective: What is the academic context? What core problem does it solve?
- Methods: What methods were used? Where did the data come from?
- Results: What are the primary findings?
- Conclusion: What is the final conclusion, contribution, and significance?
1. Introduction
1.1. Research Background & Problem Statement
- Detail the research field and existing controversies or challenges.
- Precisely extract the core Research Questions (RQs).
1.2. Literature Review & Research Gap
- Summarize key literature and identify current deficiencies.
- Pinpoint the “Research Gap” and the specific innovation of this paper.
1.3. Objectives & Hypotheses/Propositions
- State the clear research objectives.
- List core Hypotheses or Propositions.
2. Methodology
2.1. Research Paradigm & Methodology
- Clarify if it is Qualitative, Quantitative, or Mixed-method.
- Explain the specific methods (case study, survey, experiment, grounded theory) and why they were chosen.
2.2. Data Source & Sample
- Describe data sources (interviews, databases, web scraping, etc.).
- Define sample selection criteria, size, and characteristics.
2.3. Operationalization & Measurement
- For quantitative, explain how key variables were measured.
- For qualitative, explain how concepts were observed and coded.
3. Results & Findings
3.1. Overview of Key Findings
- Present core results objectively, following the order of hypotheses.
3.2. Interpretation of Key Data & Figures
- Select the top 1-3 most important figures or tables.
- Explain relationships, trends, and data support.
4. Discussion
4.1. In-depth Interpretation of Results
- Explain what the findings mean and how they answer the research questions.
4.2. Theoretical Contributions
- Clarify how the paper validates, extends, or revises existing theories.
4.3. Practical Implications
- Provide actionable advice for practitioners or policymakers.
4.4. Limitations & Future Research
- Discuss limitations (sample, scope, method).
- Propose directions for future research.
5. Conclusion
- Synthesize the study’s primary discovery and contribution.
6. Core References
- List the top 3-5 most important cited references to map the academic context.